Qualified health claims are not the best types of language a brand can put on its label, considering mandated use of words like "Inconsistent and inconclusive." Does such hemming-and-hawing language really help brands to sell supplements? Maybe it's better than nothing. 

And that's what magnesium suppliers and supplements brands can look forward to when FDA on Jan. 10 granted a petition to allow a qualified health claim around magnesium for the health concern of high blood pressure.

Magnesium, it should be noted, has overtaken calcium as the most popular mineral in sales, and is vital for perhaps as many as 700 different biochemical reactions in the body, from muscle cramps, anxiety, sleeplessness, constipaiton, migraines, depression, to high cholesterol, heart flutters, diabetes and heart disease including stroke. Magnesium is routinely used alongside calcium, though the traditional 1:2 ratio has in recent years been upended with magnesium now sharing top billing with calcium at a 1:1 ratio for bone-health supplements. 

“We are pleased FDA recognizes the role of magnesium in reducing the risk of hypertension in addition to this essential nutrient’s many other functions in the body,” stated Andrea Wong, Ph.D., senior vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs for the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), the trade group that supported the petition filed by the Center for Magnesium Education and Research.

Related:This is your brain on magnesium

FDA announced it is allowing three separate qualified health claims that may be used on labels and labeling, provided the text of each claim is used just as FDA has stated.

Qualified health claims are supported by scientific evidence, but do not meet the more rigorous “significant scientific agreement” standard required for an authorized health claim. It's not exactly the sexiest language a company can print on a label but it can help retailers to explain the benefits of magnesium supplements as well as high-mag foods to shoppers. 

The three qualified claims FDA said could be used must read as follows:

Related:Trends and Innovations in the Magnesium Market

"FDA's response letter is 42 pages long and provides an exhaustive review of the literature and the rationale for establishing the claims as they did,” said Loren Israelsen, president of the United Natural Products Alliance (UNPA). “This is a very useful document. We encourage you to review it, should you now choose to use one or all of these qualified health claims.”

The current Daily Value for magnesium is 420 mg/day. Foods or supplements that provide 84 mg or more magnesium meet the definition of a source that is “high” in magnesium.

People with hypertension have SBP readings > 130 mmHg or DBP > 80 mmHg.

Although only perhaps 2% of Americans suffer from an abject magnesium deficiency, as many as three out of every four Americans do not meet the recommended intake.

Foods with the adequate “high” levels of magnesium (20% of the Daily Value) can also qualify for the qualified health claim.

Good food sources of magnesium are nuts, green leafy vegetables, legumes and whole grains.

A food is disqualified if it contains inappropriate levels of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol or sodium. There is an exception around the use of tree nuts.

As for magnesium safety, FDA used diarrhea as a clinically defined endpoint and concluded the safe upper intake level is 350 mg/day in supplements. For children, the upper intake level is 5 mg/kg body weight per day, which is roughly 65mg/day for children ages 1-3 and 110 mg for children 4-8 years old.

Because of FDA’s safety concerns, a supplement cannot contain more than 350mg magnesium to qualify for the qualified health claim.

The petition included 120 publications that evaluated the relationship between magnesium intake lowering blood pressure or hypertension risk. FDA itself located an additional 10 relevant intervention studies and one relevant observational study through a literature search for studies evaluating the relationship between magnesium intake and risk of hypertension.

Yet only 85 studies were intervention studies, and of those, FDA said conclusions could not be drawn from 47 of them, for reasons ranging from the use of intravenous magnesium, no control groups, magnesium used in combination with other nutrients, and the like.

That still left 38 intervention studies that FDA said could be properly evaluated.

The agency gave a paragraph summary of each of the 38 studies.

Of the 38 studies that looked at the relationship between blood pressure and intake of elemental magnesium from dietary supplements, only 18 showed a statistically significant benefit.

“Based on the findings of these 38 intervention studies, FDA concludes there is some credible evidence suggesting a relationship between the intake of elemental magnesium from conventional foods and dietary supplements and reduced risk of high blood pressure (hypertension),” wrote Claudine Kavanaugh, Ph.D., MPH, RD, director of the Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) within FDA. “However, this evidence is inconclusive because the results of the studies are inconsistent. The findings of the minority of intervention studies that found a statistically significant lowering of blood pressure from intake of elemental magnesium are undermined by the larger body of evidence that found no effect on blood pressure.”

Study results were inconsistent in both subjects with normal or elevated SBP or DBP or in studies conducted in subjects with hypertension. Results were also inconsistent in studies conducted in subjects with preexisting CVD (including coronary artery disease and other forms of coronary heart disease). In addition, results were inconsistent across the whole range of magnesium intakes and forms of magnesium studied (181 mg/day to 960 g/day), age of study participants (mean ages 20 to 71 years, study durations (2 weeks to 6 months) and sample sizes (7 to 227 subjects consuming magnesium)).

Consistency of the findings among similar and different study designs is important for evaluating causation and the strength of the evidence. Lack of consistency among studies evaluating the same substance-disease relationship weakens the strength of the evidence.

“FDA concludes that while there is some credible evidence suggesting that combined intake of elemental magnesium from conventional foods and dietary supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension by lowering blood pressure, this evidence is inconclusive and inconsistent.”